regs to riches

Share this post

📹 1991 small change

www.regs2riches.com

📹 1991 small change

digital health care + consumer protection

Vass Bednar
Mar 21, 2022
5
Share this post

📹 1991 small change

www.regs2riches.com

Twitter avatar for @benjrainwrite
Benj @benjrainwrite
Me using a whisk: Haha fuck yeah!!! Yes!! Me having to wash a whisk: Well this fucking sucks. What the fuck.
11:12 PM ∙ Mar 11, 2022
169,661Likes15,216Retweets
Twitter avatar for @CheeseCakePCK
Philipp Kostelecky @CheeseCakePCK
My favourite kid I ever taught when I was a swim teacher was this little 4-year-old Italian boy. One time he sneezed and nobody said anything so he just went “what? No bless yous for Giacomo?”
12:00 AM ∙ Mar 14, 2022
182,599Likes11,918Retweets
Twitter avatar for @EmoPhilips
Emo Philips @EmoPhilips
no one on twitter has the right to complain about losing an hour
8:16 PM ∙ Mar 13, 2022
48,972Likes4,924Retweets

A policy decision from 1991 could be leaving people that pay out of pocket for a medical consultation via health tech without meaningful consumer protection. 📟

Did you know that services regulated under health professionals legislation (the Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991 “RHPA” and health profession Acts (i.e. Medicine Act, 1991) in Ontario are exempt from the province’s Consumer Protection Act (CPA)?

When you sign a contract with a business or individual to buy or lease products or services, including subscription agreements and Internet agreements, the Consumer Protection Act protects you from unfair practices.

So, because the CPA is concerned with things like unfair prices and consumer agreement requirements, there could be a gap for virtual health services. 🏥

The logic behind this gap seems to be because health professions are self regulating - i.e. physician services are exempt from the Consumer Protection Act because the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario regulates how they deliver services, including the agreements they enter into and how they promote those services. However, this legislative scheme was last updated 30 years ago, well before subscription models of digital health care were contemplated.

In some ways, the fact that health professions are regulated by professional colleges provides a platform for robust consumer protection. But in no way have these institutions demonstrated that they are prepared to regulate virtual care frameworks where patients may not even be physically located in Ontario. This is [yet another] example of how easily legislative environments can become outmoded in light of digital innovation. Not a huge deal - just something that happens. However, regulators need to stay on top of this stuff and practice ‘radical incrementalism’ - frequently updating of our laws so that they are responsive to contemporary realities.

Leave a comment

As it stands, this gap is pretty great for virtual health services providers that are not held to the same standard under the CPA and it sucks for consumers, who technically have no recourse if a health/med-tech firm screws them.

Examples of virtual health services include:

  • Maple

  • Dialogue

  • LifeSpeak

  • MindBeacon

  • TELUS’ Health MyCare

Virtual care services covered by the Ontario Virtual Care Program are not insured under the Health Insurance Act (HIA), which means individuals or their third party plans pay for them directly.

Here’s the question: if colleges regulating health professions are inept at regulating digital tools that are truly *different* modes of providing care, does that exemption from 1991 still work to protect people in Ontario that are now consuming health services out-of-pocket? 🤷🏽‍♀️

OR

should they be brought back under consumer protection legislation when they provide services that (a) are not publicly funded and/or (b) look and feel a lot more like consumer products than health care? 🤷‍♂️

Share

regs to riches
🩺 Startups are Privatizing Health, Policymakers Let Them
Trying out a longer form piece, as a follow up to #16. The tech economy is coming for our cherished public health care system, and it might be policymakers’ fault. Celebrated startup Maple, a virtual healthcare platform, has raised more than $14M USD…
Read more
3 years ago · 6 likes · 3 comments · Vass Bednar

Robin Shaban and I point to how the provinces are uniquely positioned to take on the monopsony power of gig work platforms in The Conversation.

Twitter avatar for @ConversationCA
The Conversation Canada @ConversationCA
Provincial competition law needed to address the power of gig work platforms
theconversation.comProvincial competition law needed to address the power of gig work platformsNew legislation could strengthen the social contract between workers and platforms.
5:00 PM ∙ Mar 17, 2022
5Likes1Retweet

I got to comment on a recent Loblaw acquisition for the Toronto Star (!).

Twitter avatar for @jacoblorinc
Jacob Lorinc @jacoblorinc
With its latest acquisition, Loblaw shows it's primarily a tech-driven provider of private health-care services — that just so happens to also sell groceries. My story on Weston's $845mil purchase of Lifemark, with quotes from @VassB and @quaid_jennifer:
thestar.comFrom bakery to ‘tech behemoth’: How Loblaw became a titan of the private health-care industryLoblaw’s $845-million acquisition ofLifemark Health Group is part of a rapid expansion into health services and technology.
12:41 PM ∙ Mar 16, 2022
1Like1Retweet

Join us for a hybrid event happening on April Fool’s to celebrate the 50th anniversary of Policy Options.

Twitter avatar for @IRPP
IRPP/Policy Options @IRPP
Next up on April 1 (there's no fooling us!) we're off to Hamilton for Health tech: The politics and policies of remote rehabilitation, with @McMasterU & @VassB. Register now! (pssst, if you join us in person, free lunch is involved...)
irpp.orgHealth tech: The politics and policies of remote rehabilitation - IRPPThis discussion will consider how during the pandemic there has been a proliferation of new health technology initiatives that allow for remote rehabilitation outside of a formal clinic setting.
9:42 PM ∙ Mar 11, 2022
2Likes1Retweet

Register for event


🎶 Vass Bednar saw Mitski with her girlfriends at Massey!

Read regs to riches in the Substack app
Available for iOS and Android

Share this post

📹 1991 small change

www.regs2riches.com
Previous
Next
Comments
TopNewCommunity

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Vass Bednar
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing