![Twitter avatar for @JeffKasanoff](https://substackcdn.com/image/twitter_name/w_96/JeffKasanoff.jpg)
My date for tonight cancelled and his excuse was he has to attend the Minions: Rise of Gru roller skating pop-up experience
Canada’s ‘hall pass’ for Dye & Durham’s acquisitions and price hikes reinforces competition law’s shortcomings. It seems like *everyone else* is investigating the firm. So what gives? Is politics preventing Canada from investigating Dye & Durham (AKA a ‘national champions’ approach)? Is the Bureau overwhelmed? Or is our law just a little weird?
I explore this in today’s Financial Post. Curious about your take, too.
![Twitter avatar for @CarmichaelKevin](https://substackcdn.com/image/twitter_name/w_96/CarmichaelKevin.jpg)
.@VassB takes to @financialpost to ask why Canada's $DND is being investigated by competition authorities in Oz and the UK, but not @CompBureau:
Vass Bednar: Why is Dye and Durham facing scrutiny in Australia and Britain, but not at home?
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_600,h_314,c_fill,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F04321512-9167-43fa-8268-11c99ec04a00_1000x750.jpeg)
*And I am also quoted in this story on wage-fixing.