regs to riches

Share this post
⛹️‍♀️ point persons
www.regs2riches.com

⛹️‍♀️ point persons

people ≠ policy

Vass Bednar
Apr 28, 2021
6
3
Share this post
⛹️‍♀️ point persons
www.regs2riches.com

Twitter avatar for @tucker_devJames Tucker @tucker_dev
work-life balance in 2021: close your work macbook, walk over to your couch 3 feet away and open your personal macbook

April 22nd 2021

351 Retweets2,478 Likes

I’ve been noticing that we are are privileging new positions (people) over meaningful regulatory change (policy) in Canada.

Twitter avatar for @caparsonsChristopher Parsons @caparsons
Canada looking at creating new regulator to crack down on illegal online porn || How much of the gov’t proposals are posturing, bad policy, or failing to actually deal with real problems? At least the majority.
Canada looking at creating new regulator to crack down on illegal online pornThe federal government wants to create a new regulator to crack down on illegal online porn, including videos of childhood sexual abuse and images shared without consent, Public Safety Minister Bill Blair said in an announcement Monday.montreal.ctvnews.ca

April 13th 2021

2 Retweets9 Likes

"And that's why we will introduce legislation to create a new regulator that will ensure that online platforms remove harmful content, including depictions of childhood sexual exploitation and... images that are shared without consent."

Twitter avatar for @mgeistMichael Geist @mgeist
Three things caught my attention in Budget 2021. First, government going ahead with a Data Commissioner. Along with expected social media regulator & privacy tribunal, it’s adding layers of bureaucracy to digital environment. Privacy Commissioner of Canada largely sidelined.
Image

April 19th 2021

18 Retweets22 Likes

“To better protect people’s personal data and to encourage greater competition in the digital marketplace, we will also move forward with new regulations for large digital companies, overseen by a newly-created data commissioner.”

The Liberal platform also proposed a new role - the Canadian Consumer Advocate.

A Liberal government would also create a new Canadian Consumer Advocate, whose job will be to “serve as an independent, single point of contact for people who need help with banking, telecom, or transportation-related complaints, and will be empowered to review complaints and, if founded, impose appropriate penalties.”

Twitter avatar for @CBCNewsCBC News @CBCNews
The Department of National Defence is creating a new high-level position — a chief of professional conduct and culture — to address racism and sexual misconduct in the military.
cbc.ca/1.5998754 @Murray_BrewsterDepartment of Defence hiring high-level culture czar to fight sexual misconduct and racism in ranks | CBC NewsThe Department of National Defence plans to create a new top level position — a chief of professional conduct and culture — to address sexual misconduct and racism in the ranks, CBC News has learned.cbc.ca

April 23rd 2021

4 Retweets34 Likes

The new position is being described as "a first step" toward addressing the Canadian military's racism and sexual misconduct crisis. DND appears to be deliberately leaving the door open to further changes "once the appropriate consultations have occurred."

It’s intriguing to note these proposals for a new regulator, and whether they are accompanied by new regulation and investments in capacity. It’s like we want to demonstrate that something is a priority by putting a person “on it.” But we also need to accompany those new jobs with meaningful regulatory capacity - chops, “teeth.” If we ignore the structures that said new person is parachuting into, and the toes they may be stepping on, we set them up to fail - big time. It all feels very “put a bird on it.”

I suppose it can be comforting to know a person is accountable or ~thinking about [it]~. But the worst part of these proposed interventions is their superficiality.

Reminiscent of C-Suite additions that may be similarly challenged to quickly realize meaningful change, like Chief Diversity and Chief Equity officers. While these new roles can create new accountabilities and focus that didn’t previously exist, they also imply that previous deficit occurred because it wasn’t any one person’s core responsibility.

*Anyways, just something I’ve been noticing and have my eye on.

Leave a comment

Vass Bednar is the Executive Director of McMaster University’s new Master of Public Policy in Digital Society Program.

3
Share this post
⛹️‍♀️ point persons
www.regs2riches.com
3 Comments

Create your profile

0 subscriptions will be displayed on your profile (edit)

Skip for now

Only paid subscribers can comment on this post

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in

Check your email

For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.

Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.

Paul Wells
Writes Paul Wells Apr 29, 2021Liked by Vass Bednar

Insightful. I worry that a dysfunctional system wearing a czar like a hat is not likely to become a much more functional system.

Expand full comment
ReplyCollapse
1 reply by Vass Bednar
Dan Skilleter
May 7, 2021

I take your point about regulatory capacity - it's a good one. But I'll point out that when governments hand new mandates to existing regulators, that's typically a recipe for them being asked to do more with less. Treasury Board assumes magical levels of efficiencies. So while the creation of a new regulator is by no means a silver bullet for meaningful change, it at least has this going for it: they have a much stronger chance of walking into TB and getting adequately resourced. Whether they are also given the regulations, mandate and political space they need to succeed is an entirely different matter.

Expand full comment
ReplyCollapse
1 more comments…
TopNewCommunity

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2022 Vass Bednar
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Publish on Substack Get the app
Substack is the home for great writing