regs to riches

Share this post

🧴product placement

www.regs2riches.com

🧴product placement

👩‍💻 placing different policies for different screens

Vass Bednar
Jul 24, 2022
11
2
Share this post

🧴product placement

www.regs2riches.com
Twitter avatar for @mud_Iark
John Pfeiffer @mud_Iark
she’s a 10 but excel thinks she’s an October
10:46 PM ∙ Jul 9, 2022
64,580Likes4,621Retweets
Twitter avatar for @chuckteed
Chuck Teed @chuckteed
She's a 10, 10:30 in Newfoundland.
1:25 PM ∙ Jul 6, 2022
17,848Likes2,106Retweets
Twitter avatar for @GrahSeeYa
anna says donate to abortion funds @GrahSeeYa
She's a 10 but in Celsius. You have no idea what that means.
4:52 PM ∙ Jul 13, 2022
159,466Likes10,408Retweets
Twitter avatar for @shesgonestella
✨.::*!Lucy Watson!*::.✨ @shesgonestella
She’s a 10, but a 6 in Zara, and a 14 in H&M. why can’t she find clothes! she’s crying
11:00 AM ∙ Jul 8, 2022
434,162Likes44,747Retweets

Ok, team. 

I found a weird example where we have [pretty strict] regulations for a “new” “digital” activity, but we are hands-off with the OLD version of it. The incongruity is driving me nuts. Oh, and they are converging.

I’ve been fascinated by the regulatory threshold we impose on (mostly female?) Instagram influencers. Specifically, their requirements to disclose whether something was gifted, sponsored, or an ad. You are familiar with this, I’m sure. Newspapers similarly indicate when something is sponsored content. 

Twitter avatar for @CompBureau
Competition Bureau Canada @CompBureau
#Influencers! Start 2020 on the right track and follow us to find out how to be #InfluencerAware. 🚗 Throughout the month, we’ll be releasing useful tips to stay on the up and up. bit.ly/InfluencerAware #InfluencerMarketing #Knowthelaw #CompetitionAct
Image
1:30 PM ∙ Jan 10, 2020
9Likes9Retweets

Unfortunately, this requirement doesn’t extend to ‘independent’ think tank reports, but that’s a whole different story. 😉

regs to riches
🎠 trojan horses
Read more
a year ago · 11 likes · 1 comment · Vass Bednar

It seems to me that when girls started doing this super common thing - endorsing something - on the internet, we cracked down. And yet paid product placement on television, film, and streaming is flourishing - with absolutely no disclosure. Should influencers simply claim that their YouTube channel is a TV show? (Actually no. Don’t do that.)

More seriously: there's hypocrisy and double-standard here. We’re picking on the kids, but the adults have been on this racket forever. In fact, a recent article in the New York Times illuminated how streaming shows can even leave space for product placement that is sold and edited later. What happens when popular older shows have brands revising their tableaus?

Twitter avatar for @VassB
Vass Bednar @VassB
This @nytimes piece on product placement in streaming shows and films was published online on June 24th but appears in print today (July 10th). Scheme to nudge me away from reading the paper ON paper? Who knows but I am not budging! 🗞️nytimes.com/interactive/20…
nytimes.comAnatomy of a Product PlacementAs consumers skip ads and streaming content balloons, brands aim to be everywhere all at once.
12:24 PM ∙ Jul 10, 2022

Plus, the streaming services have data on viewers’ spending habits and brand preferences, and they’re looking into new ways to use it.

The issue is ultimately about power and agency. Who is the agent that holds the power? Why is Hollywood immune to the level of transparency expected on Insta?

📺 Firms like Netflix should be subject to the same shift in consumer expectations that are the new norm for an old activity: paying the big bucks to have your brand mentioned or placed in a cultural product. 

Twitter avatar for @FortuneMagazine
FORTUNE @FortuneMagazine
Netflix selected Microsoft as the technology and sales partner for its new advertising-supported streaming service.
bit.lyNetflix partners up with Microsoft for ad-supported streaming serviceNetflix plans to sell a cheaper subscription plan featuring ads by the end of the year.
12:57 AM ∙ Jul 14, 2022
7Likes8Retweets

Share regs to riches

I have been noodling on what a reasonable distinction could be for the discrepancy between product placement on television or film and an endorsement of a product by a person on Instagram, YouTube, or TikTok. The best I can do is the degree of active-ness. As in, an explicit endorsement through an articulated opinion as compared to an implicit one. The product placement on screen is passive, whereas influencer content tends to be active. But does that slight difference seriously warrant disclosure in one case, but not in another?

Commercials, billboards, logos on a sports jersey or naming rights for a building seem like ‘explicit’ advertising (even if they are consumed or conveyed passively). While the value/funds is not always disclosed, it is clear that a sponsorship relationship exists.

Twitter avatar for @matttomic
ℳatt @matttomic
Love all the options of different companies I can support by being a Toronto sports fan!!
Image
3:27 PM ∙ Jul 8, 2022
108Likes29Retweets

Sneaking Dell products into the show “Succession” or the Outback Steakhouse’s appearance on “Survivor” after an exchange of funds doesn’t have to be so much murkier. Any murkiness seems to come from the fact that “the majority of product placement in film and television…happens on a quid-pro-quo basis rather than in exchange for payment.”

#gifted #gift #gifts #ad #bloggerlife #collaboration #productreview 

This is all the more relevant as the concept of a metaverse(s) continues to evolve and as Netflix negotiates a foray into advertising. Product visibility in “Stranger Things 3” was valued at $15M - researchers identified over 100 visible brands across all eight episodes of the show’s third season. 

I was reminded of Netflix’s 2018 experiment with product placement in Bandersnatch by telecom good guy Ben Klass. 

Twitter avatar for @BenKlass
Ben Klass @BenKlass
@VassB Do you remember Netflix's "Bandersnatch"? (It was a choose your own adventure-style interactive show.) At one point, the viewer was asked to choose which cereal the protagonist would eat in the morning. Netflix was telling advertisers: "We can do this, your brand here."
12:32 PM ∙ Jul 10, 2022
2Likes1Retweet

Plus, Shopify is making it easy for you to make purchases on YouTube.

Twitter avatar for @BetaKit
BetaKit @BetaKit
New @Shopify partnership lets customers press play and pay on @YouTube.
betakit.comShopify launches YouTube Shopping integration in latest social commerce push | BetaKitShopify has launched an integration with YouTube to allow its merchants to connect with consumers on the video-sharing platform.
1:19 PM ∙ Jul 19, 2022
6Likes2Retweets

I just think that people should know when what they are seeking is an advertisement or not, and I am freaked out by a near-future where products in the background of a show or film can be swapped, sold or out-bid; because that matters for historical integrity, too. 

Will someone buy the Eggo space from Stranger Things and replace it with Pop Tarts? Do we care? Will we know if this happens?

There could be a promising technical solution for this disparity. Instead of voluntary disclosure through hashtags or manual additions to the start of a movie that list the product placements or ‘gifts,’ we would work towards metatags. Like, what if it was easy for everyone to be transparent? If we want all kinds of actors to be honest about paid placement, we need a consistent way for digital sponcon to at least be recognized. 

Twitter avatar for @Snowden
Edward Snowden @Snowden
Are your readers having trouble understanding the term "metadata"? Replace it with "activity records." That's what they are. #clarity
10:15 PM ∙ Nov 2, 2015
3,964Likes3,581Retweets

With a meta tag, the viewer could pause what they are watching and look at products, how it was paid for, for what amount, and whether it was gifted. 

Metatags could also help with that other bee crowding my metaphorical bonnet: private labels and privately-owned brands. The tag could help to disclose parent companies (even though I think all labels should say something like “owned by…” this is a pipe dream for MY metaverse!).  Plus, it’s already here. On Amazon Prime video they have meta tags with actor info when you pause.

Twitter avatar for @WIRED
WIRED @WIRED
Amazon's X-Ray feature shows you movie info and trivia whenever you hit pause
wrd.cmAmazon’s X-Ray Shows Movie Info Whenever You Hit PauseAmazon’s X-Ray feature is coming to Fire TV, to answer every “where do I know her from?” question you ever had
10:35 PM ∙ Apr 13, 2015
20Likes29Retweets

To summarize, here are two policy needs that I see: consistently acknowledging surreptitious, stealth online advertising, and better awareness regarding private labels and privately-held companies. ONE technical solution coupled with policy enforcement could help get us to a better place. 

BTW: also worth asking: how did we get to a place where we have different rules for what is essentially the same activity?

Most of the time, a business practice is defended as, “well, that’s been a way of doing business since long before digitization.” Private label brands are one example, offering loss-leader products as an ecosystem lock-in play is another, and product placement feels glaring as television and film have themselves digitized. 

I don’t want us to be doomed to rehash every regulatory/economic/consumer fight of the 20th century all over again in the 21st century as businesses are devoured and reconstituted in the digital economy. That would be boring. But we already decided that a paid product placement online needs to be acknowledged, so why not in the film industry? 

Loading...

💰 acquisition as public policy

📞 what if the government bought Shaw?

Below is my latest little thought experiment in the National Post.

Twitter avatar for @nationalpost
National Post @nationalpost
Vass Bednar: The federal government bought a pipeline. Maybe it should buy Shaw? financialpost.com/telecom/vass-b… @VassB
financialpost.comVass Bednar: The federal government bought a pipeline. Maybe it should buy Shaw?A purchase of Shaw by the federal government could help to ensure public accountability and diversity of networks. Read more here
6:18 PM ∙ Jul 22, 2022
10Likes1Retweet

🎶 Music for this issue provided by the Kool Kids Music Club!

Kool Kids Music Club

kool music for kool kids
By Ian Gormely
2
Share this post

🧴product placement

www.regs2riches.com
Previous
Next
2 Comments
Mark Dykeman
Writes How About This
Jul 24, 2022Liked by Vass Bednar

Here in New Brunswick there's been quite a controversy (at least in my mind) about how our dailies (now owned by PostMedia) could essentially buy a cover for a printed newspaper for messaging. This "cover" is the first thing you see before actually finding the real first page of the paper. Our provincial government has used this several times to send unnuanced messages to readers with something that looks like the first page of a newspaper, I think it's also been done by other groups. While the authorship is typically disclosed I'm very leery of it and I think there is a connection to this practice and what you write about in this post.

Expand full comment
Reply
1 reply by Vass Bednar
1 more comment…
TopNewCommunity

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Vass Bednar
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing